Find the weak spots.
Fix what matters.

League Softwares is a cybersecurity company. We help businesses find security weaknesses in their websites and source code through automated checks and reviewed assessments, and we fix the issues you ask us to fix.

The automated website and code scan is free. Deep scan credits cost ₹499 for one scan, or less per scan in packs of 5 (₹2,249), 20 (₹7,999) and 50 (₹14,999). A reviewed security assessment, where a person checks the findings in context, costs ₹9,999. A vulnerability fix package for an agreed list of issues costs ₹24,999, and larger work is quoted before we start. Prices are in Indian rupees and listed at https://www.leaguesoftwares.com/pricing.

League Softwares provides website security reviews, source code security reviews, reviewed assessments and vulnerability fixing. A free automated scanner is available at security.leaguesoftwares.com. We also build and modernise software, which is how we fix what we find.

Yes. Code written with AI assistants often ships faster than anyone can review it, and small mistakes such as exposed API keys, unchecked input, dynamically built database queries or outdated packages are common. Our code review checks for these whether the code was written by a person or an AI tool. You can scan a ZIP or a GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket repository for free, then ask us to review the findings or fix them.

Yes. The automated website and source code checks at security.leaguesoftwares.com are free and do not need an account. Reviewed assessments and fixing work are paid services, agreed with you before any work starts.

Yes. Paste the repository link and a read-only access token that can only read that one repository. The token is used once to download a single copy of the code, and is never stored or logged. The code is scanned in memory and discarded when the scan finishes. Revoke the token afterwards.

No. The automated scan crawls a limited number of public pages, or reads the source files you upload. It does not log in, submit forms or attempt to exploit anything. Authentication, access control and business logic need a separately scoped manual review.

Small businesses, startups, web agencies and developers who want to know whether their website or code has security problems, and want help fixing them. Agencies can scan many client sites from one account using prepaid credits.

Yes. After a review we agree which findings to fix, make the changes in your code or configuration, test them and give you a before and after report. Larger changes are quoted separately.

Yes. Only submit websites and code that you own or are authorised to assess. We confirm scope and authorisation before any reviewed assessment begins.

The archive is inspected in memory without being extracted or run, then discarded after the request. Reports are returned to your browser and are not saved on our server. The scanner methodology page describes this in detail.

No. A report with no findings only covers the checks that ran. Every report lists what was checked and what was not, and no review can guarantee that a system is free of vulnerabilities.

Yes. League Softwares builds AI assistants, internal knowledge search, document-processing workflows, and automation connected to business tools. We discuss data access, accuracy, human review, and operating costs before choosing an approach.

No. A description of the problem, who it affects, and what you want to improve is a useful starting point. We can define the scope together.

League Softwares builds AI assistants, internal knowledge search, document-processing workflows, and business automation. We can combine these with custom software, web or mobile interfaces, and integrations. The starting point is the problem you want to solve and the data and tools available.

Yes. The first step is reviewing the existing system, access, codebase, and any current issues. We can then agree whether targeted improvements or a larger rebuild is appropriate.

We can assess an existing application or workflow and plan suitable AI and automation integrations. The approach depends on available APIs, code access, data permissions, and the limitations of your current systems. A complete rebuild is not always necessary.

No. AI is useful for some tasks, but it is not a requirement. We choose the simplest suitable approach and discuss accuracy, privacy, human review, and ongoing costs before adding AI.

AI outputs can be wrong or incomplete. We discuss the limitations of the proposed approach, test representative workflows, and identify decisions that need human review. Data handling, access controls, and ongoing operating costs are part of the project discussion.

They depend on scope, integrations, and the current state of your product. After the initial discussion, you receive a proposal with deliverables, assumptions, and a proposed schedule.

Yes. We can collaborate through video calls, written updates, and shared project tools. We agree communication and review times that work for both sides.